The State Council instructed the Shaanxi Provincial People's Government to make an in-depth written inspection to the State Council, and the State Council informed the criticism. by Shaanxi ProvinceEight suspects of illegal production enterprises involved in the case were arrested, and 122 responsible persons of functional departments have been held accountable, including 16 department-level officials and 58 department-level cadres. 19 persons involved in the construction unit have been put on file for investigation.

-Focus 1: How did the enterprises involved allow inferior products to enter the Xi'an subway project?

In March this year, Xi'an subway was exposed to the use of substandard cables, there are serious security risks.

After the exposure of the "problem cable", the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of Supervision, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, the Ministry of Transport, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the State Administration for Industry and Commerce, the State Administration of Work, the Office of the Leading Group for Combating Intellectual Property Rights Infringement and the Production and the Production and the Production and the Production of Counterfeat the Production and the Production and the Production of Counterfeat.

After investigation by the joint investigation team, Shaanxi Okai Cable Co., Ltd., the manufacturer of "problem cables", has a registered capital of 0.1568 billion yuan, a paid-in capital of 30.4 million yuan, and its legal representative is Wang Zhiwei.

The investigation report disclosed the illegal and criminal problems of Okay Company:

One is in the cable procurement bidding bribery collusion. Its main means is to bribe engineering units and construction units.

Wang Zhiwei is suspected of giving gifts and bribes to the staff of Xi'an Metro Co., Ltd., that is, Xi'an Metro Company and related construction units. The personnel concerned take advantage of the influence of their positions and the convenience of their work to "say hello" and provide convenience.

The second is to cut corners and shoddy materials after winning the bid at a low price. Wang Zhiwei and others confessed during interrogation by the public security organs that if they produce qualified products with the quotation of the winning contract, they will all lose money. Therefore, they will take measures such as "slimming down" the inner core of the cable to reduce costs to ensure profitability. Investigation by the public security organs found that Okai Company marked the product specification "code" on the production task list and produced defective products. For example, the product marked "A-5" indicates that the cross-sectional area of the inner core is actually 95% of the standard, the "B" specification indicates that the cross-sectional area is actually 90% of the standard, and the "C" indicates that the cross-sectional area of the specification product is actually 85% of the standard.

Three is in the product inspection link fraud. In order to evade supervision, Okai Company has falsified in three links: enterprise self-inspection, social third-party entrusted inspection required by the owner, and random inspection by construction units: product factory inspection to reduce inspection items; Privately engraving the seals of many inspection agencies and forging inspection reports; They colluded with some engineering construction and supervision personnel, took samples, sent samples for inspection and received inspection reports in violation of regulations, and conspired to pass the customs.

-Focus 2: Why do construction and supervision units release "problem cables?

Black-hearted enterprises violate laws and regulations without fear. Some staff members of construction and supervision units responsible for quality and safety also accept property from Okai Company. Lack of management allows "problem cables" to go straight in.

According to the investigation of the joint investigation team, the construction unit did not strictly implement the relevant management measures in the acceptance of materials entering the site. In the material inspection process, Okai Company was allowed to sample, send samples and take reports by itself. Some personnel also received money and goods from Okai Company to facilitate the entry of "problem cables" produced by Okai Company into the project in the process of material bidding and procurement. For example, Tang, the project manager of the construction unit, and Fei, the minister of materials, have repeatedly provided help to Wang Zhiwei in the procurement of materials and received benefits.

However, the supervision unit not only acquiesced in Okai Company's own sampling, sample delivery and report taking in violation of regulations, but also failed to notify the construction unit in time after finding the unqualified test report, did not expand the test scope, and gave qualified opinions on the projects using "problem cables", thus colluding with each other. Some staff members of the supervision unit also received shopping cards and property from Okai Company.

-- Focus 3: Why did the government and regulatory authorities lose their layers?

According to the investigation report, government functional departments neglected supervision, some cadres neglected their duties, and many security barriers were broken. In the identification of famous trademarks, the industrial and commercial departments "stole beams and replaced pillars" in violation of regulations. The quality supervision department violated the law enforcement, imposed penalties on escrow, and the notification was not publicized in time. The housing and construction department replaced the on-site supervision with layers of approval for the notification of the quality problems of Okai Company's products.

Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Industry and Commerce in the enterprise famous trademark approval processIn the "steal beam for column". According to the regulations, the famous trademark of Shaanxi Province should be "actually used for three years from the date of approval and registration". However, Okay Company applied to the Shaanxi Provincial Administration for Industry and Commerce for the "five wins" trademark of the provincial famous trademark, which was approved by the State Administration for Industry and Commerce in 2014, but applied in 2015. In the examination and approval, the Shaanxi Provincial Bureau of Industry and Commerce used "Xi'an Okai Cable Co., Ltd.", which was established in 2010, to examine and change the name to "Shaanxi Okai Cable Co., Ltd." when issuing the certificate ". After such illegal operation, the "Wusheng" trademark was illegally identified as a famous trademark in Shaanxi Province.

The Shaanxi Provincial Quality Supervision Bureau is ineffective in supervision and supervision. Individual leading cadres of subordinate units receive Okai shopping cards, and staff members collect inspection fees in violation of regulations. Xi'an Municipal Bureau of quality supervision has carried out law enforcement inspection on the cable products of Okai company used in Xi'an Metro Line 3 for four times. Among them, three batches were found to be unqualified, which were only treated as administrative punishment, but were not transferred to the judicial organ for handling according to the regulations. Five cadres and workers, including Cui Mou, the inspection team of Xi'an Quality Supervision Bureau, received money and goods, neglected their duties and dereliction of duty. On February 22, 2016, Xi'an Quality Supervision Bureau imposed an administrative penalty on Okay Company to stop sales and impose a fine, but it did not disclose it in time.

The Xi'an Municipal Government did not perform its duties in place, and neglected to supervise the Municipal Metro Office, the Municipal Construction Commission, and the Municipal Quality Supervision Bureau. Individual personnel were suspected of violating integrity and discipline and national laws and regulations. As the administrative department in charge of construction, the Xi'an Construction Committee, after receiving the notification about the "problem cable" of Okai Company, only approved the transfer layer by layer and did not take the initiative to perform the inspection. Xi 'an Metro Office, which is responsible for the construction, operation management and resource development and operation of Xi 'an urban rapid rail transit system, as the owner, has not only failed to formulate relevant institutional measures such as management methods for key equipment and materials, but also received money and goods from Okai Company. It has made use of its position convenience to facilitate Okai Company's "problem cables" to enter the project in bidding and procurement.

-Focus four: how to fundamentally control the "problem cable"?

In order to fundamentally rectify the "problem cables", the joint investigation team suggested: first of all, thoroughly check the "problem cables", comprehensively check the "problem cables" in the warehouse, in use and procurement contracts, and check them one by one. If it is found that the warehouse will be sealed immediately, the construction will be stopped before processing, and the procurement contract has been concluded will be terminated immediately. For products that have been put into use, testing and risk assessment shall be carried out, and products with potential safety hazards shall be actively rectified and resolutely replaced on the premise of ensuring the safety of project operation. It is understood that the relevant projects of the "problem cable" demolition work is intense.

Secondly, the relevant departments should study and improve the bidding management and key equipment and material procurement system, pay close attention to revising laws, regulations and supporting documents on bidding and bidding, equipment and material procurement, speed up the change of bidding and procurement management with price as the decisive factor, and implement comprehensive evaluation of technology, quality, service, brand and price.

Third, we should fully implement the work requirements of the reform of "release, management and service", and speed up the establishment and improvement of systems such as huge punitive damages and joint punishment for breach of faith. Fully implement "double random, one open" supervision, strengthen joint departmental supervision, promote inter-departmental and inter-regional enterprise-related information exchange and sharing, timely disclosure of bad information, and improve the efficiency and level of supervision.